Design flaws

The Philosophers' Magazine 54 (54):80-84 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Popular religions are practical; they are used as guides to living. But philosophical religion has no implications for how we should live. Hume thought that philosophical theism and popular monotheism cannot be coherently united. Yet incoherent unification is precisely what has happened in our own culture.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Structural flaws: Massive modularity and the argument from design.Armin Schulz - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):733-743.
Two arguments against realism.Timothy Bays - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):193–213.
Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties.Aaron Smuts - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):34-53.
In Defence of Intelligent Design.William Dembski - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 715-731.
Do Moral Flaws Enhance Amusement?Aaron Smuts - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):151-163.
The Premodern Sins of Intelligent Design.Robert T. Pennock - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 732-747.
Is informatics a design discipline?Peter Purgathofer - 2006 - Poiesis and Praxis 4 (4):303-314.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
74 (#215,284)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Bell
University of York

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references