The effectiveness of a complaint-based ethics enforcement system: Evidence from the accounting profession [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):115 - 126 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many professions, in order to enforce their ethics codes, rely on a complaint-based system, whereby persons who observe or discover ethics violations may file a complaint with an authoritative body. The authors assume that this type of system may encourage ethical behavior when practitioners believe that a punishment is likely to result from a failure to adhere to the rules. This perceived likelihood of punishment has three components: detection risk, reporting risk, and sanction risk. A survey of potential violation witnesses related to the accounting profession revealed that the profession's complaint-based enforcement system may not provide practitioners with the necessary disincentive to refrain from code violations

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#289,243)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Ethics and self-regulation for CPAs in the U.s.A.William J. Bollom - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):55 - 61.
Professional Power and Self-Regulation.Michael D. Bayles - 1986 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 5 (2):26-46.
Self-Regulation.Louis G. Lombardi - 1986 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 5 (2):68-86.
Self-Regulation.Louis G. Lombardi - 1986 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 5 (2):68-86.
Professional Values and the Problem of Regulation.Alan H. Goldman - 1986 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 5 (2):47-59.

Add more references