The History and the Future of the Psychology of Filial Piety: Chinese Norms to Contextualized Personality Construct

Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the field of psychology, filial piety is usually defined in terms of traditional Chinese culture-specific family traditions. The problem with this approach is that it tends to emphasize identification of behavioral rules or norms, which limits its potential for application in other cultural contexts. Due to the global trend of population aging, governments are searching for solutions to the accompanying financial burden so greater attention is being focused on the issue of elder care and its relevance to filial practices. We contend that the psychological investigation of filial piety in Chinese societies has progressed to the point that it can now provide a solid structure for research targeting intergenerational relations in other cultures. We describe an indigenous psychology approach that integrated Chinese historical, philosophical, and social trends to construct a model of filial piety in terms of the dual reciprocal and authoritarian filial aspects underlying parent-child relations: the dual filial piety model (DFPM). We use this model to re-conceptualize filial piety from its usual definition as a set of Chinese culture-specific norms to a contextualized personality construct represented by a pair of culturally-sensitive psychological schemas of parent-child interaction. We then describe how the DFPM can provide a framework for research on filial relations on individual, structural, societal, and cross-cultural levels. We conclude with a discussion of how the model may be able to integrate and extend Western research on intergenerational relations and contribute to the issue of elder care beyond Chinese societies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A temporal analysis of the consciousness of filial piety.Xianglong Zhang & Huang Deyuan - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):309-335.
Confucius and Filial Piety.Thomas Radice - 2017 - In Paul Rakita Goldin (ed.), A Concise Companion to Confucius. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 185–207.
The Research of a Bereaved Son by Induction in Manchu Dynasty Writing Materials.Chen Mei-Ling - 2008 - Chinese Journal of Chinese Culture University 17:83-105.
On the Legalization of "Filial Piety" in Han Dynasty from The Second Year Law.Min Liu - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:91-98.
The Reconciliation of Filial Piety and Political Authority in Early China.Soon-ja Yang - 2017 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 16 (2):187-203.
Uri ŭi koyu sasang kwa hyo kyoyuk munhwa =.Ik-su Kim - 2011 - Sŏul T'ŭkpyŏlsi: Sudŏk Munhwasa.
Edo jidai no oya kōkō.Kunihiro Yuasa - 2009 - Suita-shi: Ōsaka Daigaku Shuppankai.
Greater Self, Lesser Self: Dimensions of Self‐Interest in Chinese Filial Piety.Jack Barbalet - 2014 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (2):186-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-16

Downloads
16 (#830,801)

6 months
7 (#285,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Friendship Model of Filial Obligations.Nicholas Dixon - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):77-87.
Filial Obligation in Contemporary China: Evolution of the Culture‐System.Xiaoying Qi - 2015 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45 (1):141-161.

View all 8 references / Add more references