AbstractThe region of the Middle East is highly conflict-loaded. The absence of one distinct regional power may be considered both cause and consequence of this structural feature. At the same time, there are significant power gaps between states in the Middle East, with Israel among the most powerful actors and accordingly defined as a potential regional power. Due to the specific empirical setting of the Middle East region, an analytical design emphasizing relational and procedural dynamics is required. In attempting to develop such a design, this paper utilizes three well-established schools of thought of international relations: (neo)realism, institutionalism, and constructivism. These three schools of thought are further used for developing hypotheses on both Israeli regional policy and its effects on the Middle East. After illustrating these hypotheses in relation to four periods in the contemporary history of Israel, theoretical lessons to be learned for the analysis of regional powers in other world areas are presented.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Foundations of Modernity: Human Agency and the Imperial State.Isa Blumi - 2011 - Routledge.
Khaleeji-Capital: Class-Formation and Regional Integration in the Middle-East Gulf.Adam Hanieh - 2010 - Historical Materialism 18 (2):35-76.
The Baltic Region as an Industrial Estate: An Institutionalist Critique. [REVIEW]Lars Fuglsang - 1994 - AI and Society 8 (2):164-185.
Climate Law and Policy in North America: Prospects for Regionalism.Alastair Neil Craik & Joseph F. DiMento - unknown
Business Ethics in the Middle East.Dove Izraeli - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (14):1555-1560.
Contending Environmental Knowledge on Water in the Middle East : Global, Regional and National Contexts.J. Anthony Allan - 2000 - In Philip Anthony Stott & Sian Sullivan (eds.), Political Ecology: Science, Myth and Power. Oxford University Press. pp. 340--76165.