Hume's Evidential/Testimonial Epistemology, Probability, and Miracles

Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 12:87 - 104 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper I will critically analyze the first part of David Hume’s argument against miracles, which has been traditionally referred to as the in-principle argument. However, unlike most critiques of Hume’s argument, I will (1) present a view of evidential epistemology and probability that will take into consideration Hume’s accurate observation that miracles are highly improbable events while(2) arguing that one can be within one’s epistemic rights in believing that a miracle has occurred. As for the proper definition of a miracle, I offer the following, which I believe most religious people generally mean when they call an event miraculous: "A miracle is a divine intervention that occurs contrary to the regular course of nature within a significant historical-religious context". Although I am fully aware that this definition has its detractors, it will merely function in this paper as a working definition so that we can come to grips with Hume’s argument. This definition has been



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,102

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
David Hume and the probability of miracles.George I. Mavrodes - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (3):167-182.
Interpreting Hume on miracles.Robert A. Larmer - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (3):325-338.
Belief in miracles: Tillotson's argument against transubstantiation as a model for Hume. [REVIEW]Michael Levine - 1988 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 23 (3):125 - 160.
The credibility of miracles.Ruth Weintraub - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 82 (3):359 - 375.
Hume on miracles: Interpretation and criticism.James E. Taylor - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (4):611–624.
Hume’s Scale.Hendrik van der Breggen - 2002 - Philosophia Christi 4 (2):443 - 453.
Hume and miracles.Matthew C. Bagger - 1997 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (2):237 - 251.
Hume's abject failure: the argument against miracles.John Earman - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Prophecy, Early Modern Apologetics, and Hume's Argument against Miracles.Peter Harrison - 1999 - Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (2):241 - 256.


Added to PP

6 (#1,325,649)

6 months
1 (#1,241,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references