Res Publica 24 (2):181-198 (2018)

Abstract
According to neo-republicans, democracy is morally justified because it is among the prerequisites for freedom as non-domination. The claim that democracy secures freedom as non-domination needs to explain why democratic procedures contribute to non-domination and for whom democracy secures non-domination. This requires an account of why domination is countered by democratic procedures and an account of to whom domination is countered by access to democratic procedures. Neo-republican theory of democracy is based on a detailed discussion of the former but a scant discussion of the latter. We address this lacuna by interpreting the two most influential principles of inclusion, the all-subjected principle and the all-affected principle, in light of neo-republican commitments. The preliminary conclusion is that both principles are able to capture relations of domination between the democratic state and the people controlled by it in the relevant sense. Yet, the state has virtually unlimited powers to control residents, but only limited powers to interfere in the lives of non-residents. Republican aspirations are therefore more in tune with the all-subjected principle according to which only residents in the territory of the state should be granted rights to political participation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-016-9348-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,464
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Democratic Theory and Border Coercion.Arash Abizadeh - 2008 - Political Theory 36 (1):37-65.
Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and its Alternatives.Robert E. Goodin - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1):40–68.
On the People’s Terms.Philip Pettit - 2012 - Political Theory 44 (5):697-706.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle.Annette Zimmermann - 2018 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (2).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Freedom on the People’s Terms.Matthew Oliver - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (4):669-685.
Impunity and Domination: A Puzzle for Republicanism.Robert B. Talisse - 2014 - European Journal of Political Theory 13 (2):121-131.
Republican Freedom and the Rule of Law.Christian List - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):201-220.
Beyond Non-Domination: Agency, Inequality and the Meaning of Freedom.Sharon R. Krause - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (2):187-208.
The Insufficiency of Non-Domination.Patchen Markell - 2008 - Political Theory 36 (1):9-36.
Republicanism and Democratic Injustice.Henry S. Richardson - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):175-200.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-07

Total views
36 ( #318,304 of 2,520,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,555 of 2,520,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes