Xopoy in The _Plutus_: A Reply To Mr. Handley

Classical Quarterly 5 (1-2):49- (1955)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In an interesting article entitled ‘XOPOY in the Plutus’ Mr. E. W. Handley questions the accuracy of some observations of mine on this subject, and complains of my ‘failure to state facts’. He quotes my remark that ‘the editors freely insert () in the Plutus; but, according to Weissinger , the only example afforded by the MSS. is after 770; and here there is no lapse of time’. I added in a footnote that R inserts XOPOY after line 801, according to the Oxford text. Handley's own researches have shown him that R has KOMMATION XOPOY between 770 and 771, and that R has inserted XOPOY between 801 and 802

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Xopoy_ in the _Plutus.E. W. Handley - 1953 - Classical Quarterly 3 (1-2):55-.
Notes on the Scholia of the Plutus.W. Gunion Rutherford - 1889 - The Classical Review 3 (03):109-110.
The Latin Theatre.E. W. Handley - 1959 - The Classical Review 9 (02):136-.
Reply to Parsons, Reply to Heller, and Reply to Rea. [REVIEW]Hud Hudson - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):452-470.
In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism.Peter Forrest - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):105 - 122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
14 (#961,492)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references