The Liar Paradox

In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The first sentence in this essay is a lie. There is something odd about saying so, as has been known since ancient times. To see why, remember that all lies are untrue. Is the first sentence true? If it is, then it is a lie, and so it is not true. Conversely, suppose that it is not true. As we (viz., the authors) have said it, presumably with the intention of you believing it when it is not true, it is a lie. But then it is true!

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-20

Downloads
269 (#72,641)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Glanzberg
Rutgers - New Brunswick
Jc Beall
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Conjunctive paraconsistency.Franca D’Agostini - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):6845-6874.
Lying, fast and slow.Angelo Turri & John Turri - 2019 - Synthese 198 (1):757-775.
On mixed inferences and pluralism about truth predicates.J. C. Beall - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (200):380-382.
Hegel’s Interpretation of the Liar Paradox.Franca D’Agostini & Elena Ficara - 2021 - History and Philosophy of Logic 43 (2):105-128.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references