The historical foundations of the research-practice distinction in bioethics

Heoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):45-56 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The distinction between clinical research and clinical practice directs how we partition medicine and biomedical science. Reasons for a sharp distinction date historically to the work of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, especially to its analysis of the “boundaries” between research and practice in the Belmont Report (1978). Belmont presents a segregation model of the research-practice distinction, according to which research and practice form conceptually exclusive sets of activities and interventions. This model is still the standard in federal regulations today. However, the Commission’s deliberations and conclusions about the boundaries are more complicated, nuanced, and instructive than has generally been appreciated. The National Commission did not conclude that practice needs no oversight comparable to the regulation of research. It debated the matter and inclined to the view that the oversight of practice needed to be upgraded, though the Commission stopped short of proposing new regulations for its oversight, largely for prudential political reasons.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The Belmont Report and Innovative Clinical Research.John D. Lantos - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (2):389-400.
Introduction to the Special Issue on the Belmont Report.Franklin G. Miller & Jonathan Kimmelman - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (2):219-219.
The Origins and Drafting of the Belmont Report.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (2):240-250.
The Belmont Report and Innovative Practice.Jake Earl - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (2):313-326.
Research or clinical care: what’s the difference?Nina Hallowell - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (6):359-360.
Regulating Experimentation in Research and Medical Practice.Paul Ulhas Macneill - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 469–486.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-02

Downloads
1,314 (#13,377)

6 months
153 (#28,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Tom Beauchamp
Georgetown University
Yashar Saghai
Johns Hopkins University

References found in this work

Ethics and regulation of clinical research.Robert J. Levine - 1986 - Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
Clarifying the Concepts of Research Ethics.Robert J. Levine - 1979 - Hastings Center Report 9 (3):21-26.

Add more references