On Some Criticisms of Hume’s Principle of Proportioning Cause to Effect

Philo 2 (2):26-40 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

That no qualities ought to be ascribed to a cause beyond what are requisite for bringing about its effect(s) is a methodological principle Hume employs to evacuate arguments from design of much theological significance. In this article I defend Hume’s use of the principle against several objections brought against it by Richard Swinburne.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume = small Hume.Jeffrey Ketland - 2002 - Analysis 62 (1):92–93.
Is Hume's principle analytic?Crispin Wright - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):307-333.
The logic in logicism.Alexander Bird - 1997 - Dialogue 36 (2):341--60.
Causal necessity and logical necessity.David H. Sanford - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 33 (2):185 - 194.
On finite hume.Fraser Macbride - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):150-159.
A Bayesian proof of a Humean principle.Donald Gillies - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):255-256.
Hume on the Distinction of Reason.Paul Hoffman - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1131-1141.
Sympathy and Benevolence in Hume's Moral Psychology.Rico Vitz - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (3):261-275.
Finitude and Hume's Principle.Richard G. Heck Jr - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (6):589 - 617.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
84 (#196,199)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Beaudoin
Northern Illinois University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references