Philosophical Topics 49 (1):165-185 (2021)

Authors
Jason Stanley
Yale University
David Beaver
University of Texas at Austin
Abstract
Neutrality functions as an ideal in deliberation—we are supposed to have a neutral standpoint in debate, speak without bias or taking sides. We argue against the ideal of neutrality. We sketch how a theory of meaning could avoid commitment even to the coherence of a neutral space of discourse for exchanging reasons. In a model that accepts the ideal of neutrality, what makes propaganda exceptional is its non-neutrality. However, a critique of propaganda cannot take the form of “clearing out” the obstacles for a “neutral space of discourse for exchanging reasons”, since that is to misunderstand how speech works. Such a critique would suggest that any emotive appeal is fundamentally undemocratic, and would delegitimize almost all historical protest movements. In this paper, we contrast a neo-Fregean picture of the neutral core of language with our own practice-based view, a view that takes political propaganda and the language of protest as central cases, and in which all language practice is understood as fundamentally perspectival.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philtopics202149110
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neutrality, Critique, and Social Visibility.Alice Crary - 2021 - Philosophical Topics 49 (1):187-194.
Advocating Procedural Neutrality.Linda Bornstad - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (3):197-210.
Temporal Neutrality and Past Pains.Aron Edidin - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):423-431.
Temporal Neutrality and Past Pains.Aron Edidin - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):423-431.
Agent Neutrality is the Exclusive Feature of Consequentialism.Desheng Zong - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):677-693.
Advocating Procedural Neutrality.Linda Bomstad - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (3):197-210.
The Impossibility of Political Neutrality.Noriaki Iwasa - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):147-155.
Neutrality and Utility.Richard J. Arneson - 1990 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):215 - 240.
Neutrality as a Twofold Concept.Alexa Zellentin - 2009 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 4 (2):159-174.
Realizing 'Political' Neutrality.Robert Westmoreland - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (5):541-573.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-03-16

Total views
32 ( #358,851 of 2,519,571 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #27,320 of 2,519,571 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes