John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience and Nature [Book Review]

Idealistic Studies 22 (3):220-221 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alexander’s book has what may at first appera to be the fairly limited aim of defending Dewey’s aesthetics against a well-know charge made by Stephen Pepper and Benedetto Croce when Art and Experience was first published. Dewey, they suggested, had produced what purported to be a pragmatist theory of art. But since his theory retained many of the central tenets of idealism, the result was simply inconsistency.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience, and Nature. [REVIEW]V. Tejera - 1990 - International Studies in Philosophy 22 (1):81-81.
John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience and Nature: The Horizons of Feeling.Michael H. Mitias - 1987 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 46 (4):526-528.
John Dewey's Theory of Art, Experience and Nature. [REVIEW]Michael Eldridge - 1989 - Newsletter of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy 17 (52):12-14.
Faith in life: John Dewey's early philosophy.Donald J. Morse - 2011 - New York: Fordham University Press.
The Philosopher of the common man.John Dewey (ed.) - 1940 - New York,: Greenwood Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
8 (#1,138,312)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references