Bluffing: Its demise as a subject unto itself

Journal of Business Ethics 4 (3):191 - 196 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Business bluffing as a subject has been mentioned in various journals for at least the past 16 years. Its treatment has become one of apparent serious intent to identify it as a subject matter unto itself. Definitionally and theoretically, its essence has been specified but seemingly without due regard to its true nature. Business bluffing is an act of puffing at best and misrepresentation or fraud at worst. In either case, its legality and morality are already well defined and discussions of the subject should be directed along these established pathes. A businessman is admonished to judge things as they are, to speak of them, when properly called thereto, according to such judgment, neither adding or diminishing, neither depreciating a commodity, nor putting false color upon it. (Plain and Serious Hints and Advice for the Tradesman's Prudent and Pious Conduct, Dr. Isaac Watts, 1747.).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Response to “Is Business Bluffing Ethical?”.Roger J. Sullivan - 1984 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 3 (2):1-18.
Bluffing, puffing and spinning in managed-care organizations.Patricia Illingworth - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (1):62 – 76.
The Puzzle of the Subject as Subject in Lonergan.Frederick E. Crowe - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):187-205.
Business bluffing reconsidered.Fritz Allhoff - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 45 (4):283 - 289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
46 (#336,891)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references