In Helen Frowe & Gerald Lang (eds.), How We Fight. Oxford University Press. pp. 1-17 (2014)

Saba Bazargan-Forward
University of California, San Diego
The destruction wrought by even just wars lends undeniable appeal to radical pacifism, according to which all wars are unjust. Yet radical pacifism is fundamentally flawed. In the past decade, a moderate and more defensible form of pacifism has emerged. According to what has been called ‘contingent pacifism’, it is very unlikely that it is morally permissible to wage any given war. This chapter develops the doctrine of contingent pacifism by distinguishing and developing various versions of it, and by assessing the merits and drawbacks of each. According to ‘proportionality-based’ contingent pacifism, almost all wars with just causes are unjust ‘tout court’ because the in bello harms such wars impose on the innocent are too great relative to the relevant evils averted by achieving the war’s aims. After arguing against this view, the chapter introduces a novel, more defensible form of contingent pacifism, called ‘epistemic-based’ contingent pacifism, according to which the prevalence of mistaken judgements regarding the justness of wars, combined with the devastating harmfulness of unjust wars, requires imposing prohibitions against waging war, where the strength of the prohibition varies according to whether the government has a history of mistakes or deception regarding the justness of wars.
Keywords pacifism  contingent pacifism  war
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.
Proportionality in the Morality of War.Thomas Hurka - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (1):34-66.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Morally Heterogeneous Wars.Saba Bazargan - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (4):959-975.
Pacifism and Moral Theory.Jeff McMahan - 2010 - Diametros 23:44-68.
Contingent Pacifism and the Moral Risks of Participating in War.Larry May - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (2):95-112.
Pacifism and Punishment.J. Angelo Corlett - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (4):945-958.
Pacifism: Equipment or Accessory of War?Petar Bojanić - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (4):1037-1047.
Pacifism.William J. Hawk - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Pacifism, Just War, and Self-Defense.Cheyney Ryan - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (4):1-29.
I. On the Alleged Inconsistency, Moral Insensitivity and Fanaticism of Pacifism.Richard Routley - 1984 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):117 – 136.
On an Argument Against Pacifism.Michael Martin - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 26 (5-6):437 - 442.
Pacifism: A Philosophical Exploration.Carlo Filice - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17:119-153.
Pacifism: A Philosophical Exploration.Carlo Filice - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17:119-153.


Added to PP index

Total views
247 ( #43,960 of 2,499,690 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #37,608 of 2,499,690 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes