- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls, and Habermas
State University of New York Press (1991)
Abstract
This book is a comparative study of Kant, Rawls, and Habermas and a critical survey of recent theories of justice. It defends the thesis that the normative ground or basis of social criticism is found in a concept of the person as a free and equal moral beingAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Kenneth Baynes, The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls, and Habermas Reviewed by.Tony Couture - 1993 - Philosophy in Review 13 (2):67-69.
Review: Baynes, The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls and Habermas. [REVIEW]M. S. Lane - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (184):399.
The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls, and Habermas.David M. Estlund - 1992 - Political Theory 20 (4):694-697.
Freedom and recognition in Hegel and Habermas.Kenneth Baynes - 2002 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (1):1-17.
Rawls and Habermas on religion in the public sphere.Melissa Yates - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (7):880-891.
Clarifying the foucault—habermas debate: Morality, ethics, and `normative foundations'.Matthew King - 2009 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (3):287-314.
Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls–Habermas Debate.Jørgen Pedersen - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):399-432.
Sociological not political: Rawls and the reconstructive social sciences.Terrence Kelly - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):3-19.
Rawlsian Justice.Fabienne Peter - 2009 - In Paul Anand, Prastanta Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (eds.), Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press. pp. 433--456.
Coping with constitutional indeterminacy: John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas.Todd Hedrick - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (2):183-208.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-11-06
Downloads
343 (#56,481)
6 months
9 (#290,637)
2014-11-06
Downloads
343 (#56,481)
6 months
9 (#290,637)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Colonization Thesis: Habermas on Reification.Timo Jütten - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):701 - 727.
A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility.Jeffery Smith - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):223 - 246.
A precis of a communicative theory of the firm.Jeffery D. Smith - 2004 - Business Ethics 13 (4):317-331.
A précis of a communicative theory of the firm.Jeffery D. Smith - 2004 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 13 (4):317-331.
Toward a New Feminist Liberalism: Okin, Rawls, and Habermas.Amy R. Baehr - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (1):49 - 66.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo