Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):109-122 (2009)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This article is the first in a two-part review of policy design for human embryo research in Canada. In this article we explain how this area of research is circumscribed by law promulgated by the federal Parliament (the Assisted Human Reproduction Act ) and by guidelines issued by the Tri-Agencies (the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans and Updated Guidelines for Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research ). In so doing, we provide the first comprehensive account of the rules currently governing human embryo research in Canada. In this article we also provide a chronological description of relevant policy initiatives and outcomes related to these policy instruments over the past 20 years, with particular attention to public involvement in policy design. This sets the stage for the second article (scheduled to appear in vol. 6 issue 3) in which we critically analyse the history of policy design for human embryo research in Canada, applying a typology of modes of public consultation developed by Eric Montpetit. Our goal is to carefully explain the various episodes of policy development and their corresponding outcomes, in order to more effectively address emerging questions about the legitimacy of future policy initiatives for human embryo research in Canada.
|
Keywords | Embryos Stem cells Research Policy Public consultation |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s11673-009-9135-8 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Donating Fresh Versus Frozen Embryos to Stem Cell Research: In Whose Interests?Carolyn McLeod & Françoise Baylis - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (9):465–477.
Citations of this work BETA
The Oversight and Practice of Oocyte Donation in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada.Aaron D. Levine - 2011 - HEC Forum 23 (1):15-30.
Policy Design for Human Embryo Research in Canada: An Analysis (Part 2 of 2). [REVIEW]Françoise Baylis & Matthew Herder - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):351-365.
Similar books and articles
The Scope of Public Discourse Surrounding Proposition 71: Looking Beyond the Moral Status of the Embryo. [REVIEW]Tamra Lysaght, Rachel A. Ankeny & Ian Kerridge - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):109-119.
Human Dignity in International Policy Documents: A Useful Criterion for Public Policy?Inmaculada de Melo-martín - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (1):37-45.
Embryo Politics: Ethics and Policy in Atlantic Democracies.Thomas F. Banchoff - 2011 - Cornell University Press.
Stem Cell Research: An Ethical Evaluation of Policy Options.Nikolaus Knoepffler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):55-74.
Engineering Human Reproduction: A Challenge to Public Policy.Samuel Gorovitz - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (3):267-274.
The Tri-Council Policy Statement and Research in Cyberspace: Research Ethics, the Internet, and Revising a 'Living Document'. [REVIEW]Heather A. Kitchin - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (4):397-418.
Political Interventions in U.S. Human Embryo Research: An Ethical Assessment.Ronald M. Green - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):220-228.
Arguing Along the Slippery Slope of Human Embryo Research.Jeanne Salmon Freeman - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):61-81.
Policy Design for Human Embryo Research in Canada: An Analysis (Part 2 of 2). [REVIEW]Françoise Baylis & Matthew Herder - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):351-365.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-02-02
Total views
52 ( #219,994 of 2,519,496 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,496 )
2009-02-02
Total views
52 ( #219,994 of 2,519,496 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,496 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads