Do Animals Need a Theory of Mind?

In I. Leudar & A. Costall (eds.), Against Theory of Mind‎. Palgrave. pp. 167--188 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book brings together disparate strands of ToM research, lays out historical roots of the idea, and indicates better alternatives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal rights: moral theory and practice.Mark Rowlands - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Animal minds and human morals: the origins of the Western debate.Richard Sorabji (ed.) - 1993 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Human minds.David Papineau - 2001 - In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 159-183.
Animals, consciousness, and I-thoughts.Rocco J. Gennaro - 2009 - In Robert W. Lurz (ed.), The Philosophy of Animal Minds. Cambridge University Press. pp. 184--200.
Animals and Sociology.Kay Peggs - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Animal minds and the possession of concepts.Albert Newen & Andreas Bartels - 2007 - Philosophical Psychology 20 (3):283 – 308.
Personhood and Animals.Elisa Aaltola - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (2):175-193.
Science, knowledge, and animal minds.Dale Jamieson - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (1):79–102.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references