Biology and Philosophy 33 (3-4):30 (2018)

Authors
William C. Bausman
University of Zürich
Marta Halina
Cambridge University
Abstract
We evaluate a common reasoning strategy used in community ecology and comparative psychology for selecting between competing hypotheses. This strategy labels one hypothesis as a “null” on the grounds of its simplicity and epistemically privileges it as accepted until rejected. We argue that this strategy is unjustified. The asymmetrical treatment of statistical null hypotheses is justified through the experimental and mathematical contexts in which they are used, but these contexts are missing in the case of the “pseudo-null hypotheses” found in our case studies. Moreover, statistical nulls are often not epistemically privileged in practice over their alternatives because failing to reject the null is usually a negative result about the alternative, experimental hypothesis. Scientists should eschew the appeal to pseudo-nulls. It is a rhetorical strategy that glosses over a commitment to valuing simplicity over other epistemic virtues in the name of good scientific and statistical methodology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-018-9640-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,577
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind? 30 Years Later.Josep Call & Michael Tomasello - 2008 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (5):187-192.
A Material Theory of Induction.John D. Norton - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):647-670.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Modeling: Neutral, Null, and Baseline.William C. Bausman - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (4):594-616.
Mate Choice and Null Models.Karen Kovaka - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (5):1096-1106.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Modeling: Neutral, Null, and Baseline.William C. Bausman - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (4):594-616.
The Null-Hypothesis Significance-Test Procedure is Still Warranted.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):228-235.
A Viable Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Testing.Bruno D. Zumbo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):227-228.
Chow's Defense of Null-Hypothesis Testing: Too Traditional?Robert W. Frick - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):199-199.
Précis of Statistical Significance: Rationale, Validity, and Utility.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):169-194.
Null Hypotheses in Ecology.Donald R. Strong Jr - 1980 - Synthese 43 (2):271 - 285.
Null Hypotheses in Ecology.Donald R. Strong - 1980 - Synthese 43 (2):271-285.
Dirac Brackets for General Relativity on a Null Cone.Joshua N. Goldberg - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (4):439-450.
The Hamiltonian of General Relativity on a Null Surface.J. N. Goldberg - 1984 - Foundations of Physics 14 (12):1211-1216.
Neutral Theory, Biased World.William Bausman - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-23

Total views
62 ( #187,828 of 2,533,624 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,998 of 2,533,624 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes