- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Generalized erdoös cardinals and O4
Annals of Mathematical Logic 15 (3):289-313 (1978)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
On extendible cardinals and the GCH.Konstantinos Tsaprounis - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):593-602.
A Characterization of Generalized Příkrý Sequences.Gunter Fuchs - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (8):935-971.
The failure of GCH at a degree of supercompactness.Brent Cody - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (1):83-94.
Gap forcing: Generalizing the lévy-Solovay theorem.Joel David Hamkins - 1999 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):264-272.
Elementary chains and C (n)-cardinals.Konstantinos Tsaprounis - 2014 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 53 (1-2):89-118.
Identity crises and strong compactness III: Woodin cardinals. [REVIEW]Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (3):307-322.
Weak Forms of the Axiom of Choice and the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis.Arthur L. Rubin & Jean E. Rubin - 1993 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39 (1):7-22.
Exactly controlling the non-supercompact strongly compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter & Joel David Hamkins - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (2):669-688.
On measurable limits of compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1675-1688.
Powers of Singular Cardinals and a Strong Form of The Negation of The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis.Stephen H. Hechler - 1973 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 19 (3‐6):83-84.
Making all cardinals almost Ramsey.Arthur W. Apter & Peter Koepke - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (7-8):769-783.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-17
Downloads
16 (#880,136)
6 months
9 (#298,039)
2014-01-17
Downloads
16 (#880,136)
6 months
9 (#298,039)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Greatly Erdős cardinals with some generalizations to the Chang and Ramsey properties.I. Sharpe & P. D. Welch - 2011 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (11):863-902.
On the consistency strength of ‘Accessible’ Jonsson Cardinals and of the Weak Chang Conjecture.Hans-Dieter Donder & Peter Koepke - 1983 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 25 (3):233-261.
Some principles related to Chang's conjecture.Hans-Dieter Donder & Jean-Pierre Levinski - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 45 (1):39-101.
On unfoldable cardinals, ω-closed cardinals, and the beginning of the inner model hierarchy.P. D. Welch - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (4):443-458.
Bounded Martin's Maximum, weak Erdӧs cardinals, and ψ Ac.David Asperó & Philip D. Welch - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):1141-1152.
References found in this work
Some applications of model theory in set theory.Jack H. Silver - 1971 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 3 (1):45.
Review: Azriel Levy, A Hierarchy of Formulas in Set Theory. [REVIEW]Solomon Feferman - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (3):473-474.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo