- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Rhetoric of Numbers: Statistical Inference as Argumentation
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby, Reason in the Balance. [REVIEW]Steven W. Patterson - 2012 - Controvérsia 8 (1):87-91.
Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby: Reason in Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking: MacGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2010, 348 pp. [REVIEW]Claude Gratton - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):93-96.
Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby: Reason in the Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking: 2nd Edition, Hackett Publishing Company, March 2016, 488 pp.Haixia Zhong - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (2):301-305.
Commentary on Mark Battersby and Sharon Bailin’s “Critical Thinking and Cognitive Biases.”.Frank Zenker - unknown
Review of Reason in the Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking by Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby. [REVIEW]Linda Carroza - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (1):47-49.
Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic.Robert Pinto - 2001 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Aristotle’s Research on Topics: The Foundation of the Study of Inference in Argumentation.Sara Greco & Eddo Rigotti - 2018 - In Sara Greco & Eddo Rigotti (eds.), Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Cham: Springer Verlag.
What is the Statistical Inference? : An Invitation to Carnap's inductive Logic.Yusuke Kaneko - 2022 - The Basis : The Annual Bulletin of Research Center for Liberal Education 12:91-117.
Is That a Fact? Revised Edition: A Field Guide to Statistical and Scientific Information.Mark Battersby - 2013 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
n/a
Downloads
13 (#1,261,384)
6 months
3 (#1,449,818)
n/a
Downloads
13 (#1,261,384)
6 months
3 (#1,449,818)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7cb8d487df-cx8bv uwo