Religious Presuppositions of Logic and Rationality

Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 23 (1):5-57 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a crisis in philosophical rationality today—in which modern logic is implicated—that can be traced to the abandonment of a common background of principles. The situation has no parallel within the pre-modern tradition, which not only admits of such principles, but also refers them back to a set of assumptions grounded in a clearly religious frame of mind. Modern conceptions of rationality claim complete independence from religious sources, as from tradition more generally, and typically end up disposing of first principles altogether. The result is a fragmentation of reason, which can be seen to be dramatically exemplified in the realm of modern logic, populated by countless different systems and incompatible conceptions of what it is to be a logic. Many of the conceptual choices that became implicit in the philosophical discussions eventually leading to the rejection of the religious picture, and ultimately to the aforementioned crisis, were themselves originally linked to religious premises, so that all along, a kind of religious subconscious has subsisted throughout those disputations; however, the lack of any proper recognition of this background obstructs the possibility of making a reasonable assessment of the nature and causes of the crisis. Alasdair MacIntyre, whose thought inspires the argument developed here, reached similar conclusions regarding practical rationality and the effects of abandoning the teleological framework of Aristotelian philosophy. MacIntyre’s arguments can be adapted, as he suggests, to deal with reason more generally, and his insistence upon the tradition-laden character of rational enquiry can help point toward the grounding of human reason in religion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religious Presuppositions of Logic and Rationality.Alberto Leopoldo Batista Neto - 1970 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 23 (1):5-57.
Bayle on the (Ir)rationality of Religious Belief.Kristen Irwin - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (6):560-569.
The X-claim argument against religious belief offers nothing new.Justin McBrayer & Weston Ellis - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (2):223-232.
Amyraut on Reason and Religious Belief.Kristen Irwin - 2011 - Modern Schoolman 88 (3-4):191-200.
The Feeling of Religious Longing and Passionate Rationality.Ruth Rebecca Tietjen - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (3):131--152.
Rationality of Religious Belief.Grant Rehr - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Reading
Metaphysics, History, And Rational Justification.Kent Reames - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (2):257-281.
Logic in religious and non-religious belief systems.Piotr Balcerowicz - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (1):113-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-06

Downloads
8 (#1,138,312)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language.Rudolf Carnap - 1959 - In A. J. Ayer (ed.), Logical Positivism. New York: The Free Press. pp. 60-81.
The justification of deduction.Michael Dummett - 1978 - In Truth and other enigmas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references