Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):393 - 414 (2010)

Using information collected from a convenience sample of graduate and undergraduate students affiliated with a Midwestern university in the United States, this study determined the extent to which gender (defined as sex differences) is related to consumers' moral philosophies and ethical intentions. Multivariate and univariate results indicated that women were more inclined than men to utilize both consequence-based and rulebased moral philosophies in questionable consumption situations. In addition, women placed more importance on an overall moral philosophy than did men, and women had higher intentions to behave ethically. The marketing and practical implications of these findings are discussed, and the limitations of the research are presented along with several suggestions for future inquiry, which could advance current understanding of consumer ethics
Keywords moral philosophies  ethical reasoning  ethical intentions  gender
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0386-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Harvard University Press.
Ethics.William K. Frankena - 1963 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

View all 87 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
88 ( #135,491 of 2,533,629 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,998 of 2,533,629 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes