Critical thinking and cognitive biases

Abstract

We argue that psychological research can enhance the identification of reasoning errors and the development of an appropriate pedagogy to instruct people in how to avoid these errors. In this paper we identify some of the findings of psychologists that help explain some common fallacies, give examples of fallacies identified in the research that have not been typically identified in philosophy, and explore ways in which this research can enhance critical thinking instruction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,515

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Thinking about Critical Thinking.Jeffrey Maynes - 2013 - Teaching Philosophy 36 (4):337-351.
Fallacies and Logical Errors.Herman E. Stark - 2000 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (1):23-32.
You've Got to Be Kidding!: How Jokes Can Help You Think.John Capps & Donald Capps - 2009 - Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Donald Capps.
How We Know What Isn't So.Thomas Gilovich - 1993 - New York, NY, USA: Free Press.
Fallacies in the Age of Social Media.Paridhi Chaudhary - 2022 - International Journal of Philosophical Practice 8 (1):155-161.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
34 (#534,893)

6 months
6 (#1,139,313)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?