Abstract
This paper discusses the potential of the notions of reification and consensualization as developed by the theory of social representations as analytical tools for addressing the communication between the lay and scientific spheres. Social Representations Theory started by offering an over-sharp distinction between the reified and the consensual universes of which science and common sense, respectively, were presented as paradigmatic. This paper, however, suggests that the notions of consensual and reified can be considered as describing two distinct communicative formats: reification implying the use of arguments which establish prescriptions for representations and action, and consensualization relying on arguments which recognize the heterogeneity of representation and action. We illustrate this proposal through the analysis of a case in which the expert and the lay spheres of a Lisbon neighborhood opposed each other regarding the new laws of public participation in community matters. This analysis showed how reification and consensualization can be used as discursive formats by both spheres. The implications of the use of reification and consensualization and how they may depend on several power resources and have different impacts on social change are discussed
Keywords social change  power relations  scientific and lay spheres  communicative formats  social representation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00412.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.Richard Rorty - 1979 - Princeton University Press.
Economy and Society.Max Weber - 2013 - Harvard University Press.
Pandora’s Hope.Bruno Latour - 1998 - Harvard University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-03

Total views
48 ( #236,111 of 2,507,593 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,593 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes