Should (Analytic) Philosophy Leave Its History Behind? On A Recent Reappraisal of the Russell / Bradley Debate

Chromatikon 6:217-224 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Russell and the Identity of Indiscernibles.Michael C. Bradley - 1986 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (3):325 - 333.
Relations, Again: A Reply to Gull.M. S. Gram - 1971 - New Scholasticism 45 (4):611-618.
Bradley’s Paradox and Russell’s Theory of Relations.Richard Parker - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:261-273.
Why did Bradley matter to Whitehead?Pierfrancesco Basile - 2004 - Bradley Studies 10 (1-2):15-32.
Bradley’s Paradox and Russell’s Theory of Relations.Richard Parker - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:261-273.
Writings on logic and metaphysics.Francis Herbert Bradley - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James W. Allard & Guy Stock.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
10 (#1,025,836)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references