Ought to Is: The Puzzle of Moral Science

Oxford Studies in Metaethics 12 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Practical Reasons and Moral "Ought".Patricia Greenspan - 2007 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 2:172-199.
Practical reasons and moral ‘ought’.Patricia Greenspan - 2007 - In Russell Schafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Clarendon Press. pp. 172–94.
The Puzzle of Pure Moral Motivation.Adam Lerner - 2018 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 13:123-144.
The meaning of the 'ought'.Ralph Wedgwood - 2006 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 1. Clarendon Press.
Moral Disagreement and Moral Expertise.Sarah McGrath - 2008 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 3:87-108.
Moral feelings and moral concepts.Allan Gibbard - 2006 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 1:195-215.
The Metaethical Insignificance of Moral Twin Earth.Janice Dowell J. L. - 2010 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 5. [REVIEW]Michael Cholbi - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):459-462.
How Objectivity Matters.David Enoch - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 5:111-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-30

Downloads
590 (#40,073)

6 months
64 (#87,829)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Christian Coons
Bowling Green State University
John Basl
Northeastern University

Citations of this work

Is Metaphysics Immune to Moral Refutation?Alex Barber - 2020 - Acta Analytica 35 (4):469-492.
Ethical Evidence.Steven Diggin - 2022 - Synthese 200 (4):1-24.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Does conceivability entail possibility.David J. Chalmers - 2002 - In Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 145--200.
The Philosophy of Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2007 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.

View all 22 references / Add more references