Eudoxos versus Dedekind

Filozofia Nauki 2 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

All through the XXth century it has been repeated that "there is an exact correspondence, almost coincidence between Euclid's definition of equal ratios and the modern theory of irrational numbers due to Dedekind". Since the idea was presented as early as in 1908 in Thomas Heath's translation of Euclid's Elements as a comment to Book V, def. 5, we call it in the paper Heath's thesis. Heath's thesis finds different justifications so it is accepted yet in different versions. In the paper its historical and mathematical version is reconstructed. We next reconstruct Eudoxos' theory of proportions in an axiomatic fashion. Finally, we show that Heath's thesis both in the historical and mathematical version is false. To this end a counterexample is given; it is based upon a specific interpretation of the uniform distribution theorem

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

O przedmiocie matematycznym.Piotr Błaszczyk - 2004 - Filozofia Nauki 2 (1):45-59.
On dedekind complete o-minimal structures.Anand Pillay & Charles Steinhorn - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):156-164.
Homogeneous and universal dedekind algebras.George Weaver - 2000 - Studia Logica 64 (2):173-192.
The First-Order Structure of Weakly Dedekind-Finite Sets.A. C. Walczak-Typke - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (4):1161 - 1170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-14

Downloads
1 (#1,866,476)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references