Why metrical properties are not powers

Synthese 190 (12):2001-2013 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What has the dispositional analysis of properties and laws (e.g. Molnar, Powers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003; Mumford, Laws in nature, Routledge London, 2004; Bird, Nature’s metaphysics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2007) to offer to the scientific understanding of physical properties?—The article provides an answer to this question for the case of spacetime points and their metrical properties in General Relativity. The analysis shows that metrical properties are not ‘powers’, i.e. they cannot be understood as producing the effects of spacetime on matter with metaphysical necessity. Instead they possess categorical characteristics which, in connection with specific laws, explain those effects. Thus, the properties of spacetime do not favor the metaphysics of powers with respect to properties and laws

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-30

Downloads
80 (#201,278)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Nature's Metaphysics: Laws and Properties.Alexander Bird - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Powers: A Study in Metaphysics.George Molnar - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Stephen Mumford.
Laws in nature.Stephen Mumford - 2004 - New York: Routledge.
Dispositions.Stephen Mumford - 1998 - Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.
Physical Causation.Phil Dowe - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references