Une identité impériale sans Empire? Le sens de la politique de décolonisation britannique Imperial Identity without Empire? The Meaning of the British Decolonisation Policy

Abstract

Britain’s history as a nation and a great power cannot be dissociated from the concept of imperialism. The object of this article will be to study the way Britain managed to adapt her imperial identity to the post-colonial world that her own decolonisation policy contributed to pace. As the shaping of decolonisation in Africa accelerated at the end of the 1950s, the Commonwealth of Nations was considered by Britain as an ideal through which the Empire and its assets could survive. Because of the Rhodesian deadlock, the former colonial power was put in the dock by her African Commonwealth partners in 1966. This provoked an unprecedented crisis within the Commonwealth of Nations. Through a very symbolical process, the British Prime Minister managed to reverse the situation and declared Britain’s independence within the post-colonial association. After the Rhodesian crisis, Britain was no longer an imperialist power, but her imperial identity and ambitions on the world political scene survived through the Commonwealth of Nations and can also be identified today in Tony Blair’s vision of Britain as a “pivotal partner”, a link between North and South. Though the Commonwealth Rhodesian crisis, Britain managed to reconcile her imperial identity with her post-colonial responsibilities. If the Commonwealth is no longer considered as the main pillar of Britain’s international role in the world, it remains an important element through which an idea of Britain’s global role, which remains imperial in essence, is still promoted. In fact, in spite of the crisis of identity she underwent in the middle of the 1960s, we may say that, at the end of the day, Britain never renounced her imperial identity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Imperial Rome and Britain's Language of Empire 1600–1837.Norman Vance - 2000 - History of European Ideas 26 (3):211-224.
A defence of Wiredu’s project of conceptual decolonisation.Mary Carman - 2016 - South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (2):235-248.
Imperial Britain at War.Karl W. Schweizer - 1997 - The European Legacy 2 (6):1031-1035.
Four. Jeremy Bentham: Legislator of the World?Jennifer Pitts - 2007 - In A Turn to Empire. Cambridge University Press. pp. 103-122.
A Turn to Empire.Jennifer Pitts - 2007 - Ethics and International Affairs 21 (2).
Abbreviations.Jennifer Pitts - 2007 - In A Turn to Empire. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-24

Downloads
2 (#1,635,221)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references