The role of religion in the Lutheran response to Copernicus

In Margaret J. Osler (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press. pp. 59--88 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Copernicus, the orbs, and the equant.Peter Barker - 1990 - Synthese 83 (2):317 - 323.
Lutheran questions, Lutheran answers: exploring Christian faith.M. E. Marty - 2008 - Hts Theological Studies 64 (3):1565-1566.
IV. A Response to My Critics.Terrence W. Tilley - 1997 - Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):93-99.
Constructing copernicus.Peter Barker - 2002 - Perspectives on Science 10 (2):208-227.
Erratum to: The lutheran influence on Kant’s depraved will. [REVIEW]Dennis Vanden Auweele - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):135-135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
2 (#1,784,141)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Who has scientific knowledge?K. Brad Wray - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (3):337 – 347.
Constructing copernicus.Peter Barker - 2002 - Perspectives on Science 10 (2):208-227.
Commentary 02 on Goldstein 1980.Peter Barker - 2008 - Centaurus 50 (1-2):189-194.
Rethinking Sixteenth-Century ‘Lutheran Astronomy’.Gábor Almási - 2014 - Intellectual History Review 24 (1):5-20.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references