Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (2):328-353 (2017)

Authors
C. Tyler DesRoches
Arizona State University
Paul Bartha
University of British Columbia
Abstract
Some environmental ethicists and economists argue that attributing infinite value to the environment is a good way to represent an absolute obligation to protect it. Others argue against modelling the value of the environment in this way: the assignment of infinite value leads to immense technical and philosophical difficulties that undermine the environmentalist project. First, there is a problem of discrimination: saving a large region of habitat is better than saving a small region; yet if both outcomes have infinite value, then decision theory prescribes indifference. Second, there is a problem of swamping probabilities: an act with a small but positive probability of saving an endangered species appears to be on par with an act that has a high probability of achieving this outcome, since both have infinite expected value. Our paper shows that a relative concept of infinite value can be meaningfully defined, and provides a good model for securing the priority of the natural environment while avoiding the failures noted by sceptics about infinite value. Our claim is not that the relative infinity utility model gets every detail correct, but rather that it provides a rigorous philosophical framework for thinking about decisions affecting the environment.
Keywords infinite decision theory  environmental ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00048402.2016.1182196
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Weighing Lives.John Broome - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Weighing Lives.Daniel M. Hausman - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):718-722.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Concept and Conservation of Critical Natural Capital.C. Tyler DesRoches - 2020 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (N/A):1-22.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Consistent Set of Infinite-Order Probabilities.David Atkinson & Jeanne Peijnenburg - 2013 - International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 54:1351-1360.
Infinite Lotteries, Large and Small Sets.Luc Lauwers - 2017 - Synthese 194 (6):2203-2209.
On Infinite Number and Distance.Jeremy Gwiazda - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):126-130.
Infinity in Theology and Mathematics.Jill Le Blanc - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (1):51-62.
Infinite Chains and Antichains in Computable Partial Orderings.E. Herrmann - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):923-934.
Infinite Modes.Kristina Meshelski - 2015 - In Andre Santos Campos (ed.), Spinoza: Basic Concepts. Imprint Academic. pp. 43-54.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-14

Total views
235 ( #48,367 of 2,520,399 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #22,140 of 2,520,399 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes