The Opposition of Politics and War

Hypatia 23 (2):141-154 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At stake for this essay is the distinction between politics and war and the extent to which politics can survive war. Gender analysis reveals how high these stakes are by revealing the complexity of militarism. It also reveals the impossibility of gender identity as foundation for a more robust politics with respect to war. Instead, a non-ideal normative differentiation among kinds of violence is affirmed as that which politically cannot not be wanted.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
626 (#26,142)

6 months
16 (#138,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bat-Ami Bar On
PhD: Ohio State University; Last affiliation: State University of New York at Binghamton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The law of peoples.John Rawls - 1999 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Edited by John Rawls.
The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):246-253.
The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 1993 - Critical Inquiry 20 (1):36-68.

View all 25 references / Add more references