Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate

, &
Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Philip Pettit & Michael Slote (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

During the past decade ethical theory has been in a lively state of development, and three basic approaches to ethics - Kantian ethics, consequentialism, and virtue ethics - have assumed positions of particular prominence

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Call number

BJ1031.B27 1997

ISBN(s)

9780631194354   9780631194347   0631194355   0631194347
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Chapters

The Consequentialist Perspective.Philip Pettit

Similar books and articles

Three Methods of Ethics. [REVIEW]Mark Van Roojen - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):721-723.
Marcia Baron, Philip Pettit, and Michael Slote, Three Methods of Ethics.S. Tudor - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (1):110.
Blackwell, 1998. Pp. xi, 419. Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate. Great Debates in Philosophy. By Marcia W. Baron, Philip Pettit, and Michael Slote. New York: Blackwell, 1997. Pp. vi, 285. A New Stoicism. By Lawrence C. Becker. Princeton: Princeton University. [REVIEW]Schluesselerlebnisse Grosser Denker von Augustinus - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (2).
Review: Sosa (gen ed), Baron, Pettit, & Slote, Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate. [REVIEW]Walford Gealy - 1999 - Kantian Review 3:122-131.
Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, and Consequentialism.Jane Singleton - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:537-551.
Virtue Ethics and Environs.James Griffin - 1998 - Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (1):56.
Utilitarianism’s response to virtue ethics.Natasza Szutta - 2006 - Diametros:40-60.
Virtue Ethics.Roger Crisp & Michael Slote (eds.) - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
The Consequentialist Perspective.Philip Pettit - 1997 - In M. Baron, P. Pettit & M. Slote (eds.), Three Methods of Ethics. Blackwell.
Recasting the "Ethics of Virtue/Ethics of Duty" Debate.David Schenck Jr - 1976 - Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (2):269 - 286.
Kantian ethics almost without apology.Marcia Baron - 1995 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ethics of Social Consequences as a Contemporary Consequentialist Theory.Ján Kalajtzidis - 2013 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 3 (3-4):159-171.
The Feminist Sexuality Debate: Ethics and Politics.Cheryl H. Cohen - 1986 - Hypatia 1 (2):71-86.
Organizing ethics: A stakeholder debate. [REVIEW]Harry Hummels - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1403-1419.
On the Methods of Thinking in Mo-bian.Hsien-Chung Lee - 2002 - Philosophy and Culture 29 (7):596-606.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
833 (#17,048)

6 months
24 (#109,950)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Pettit
Australian National University
Michael Slote
University of Miami
Marcia Baron
Indiana University, Bloomington

Citations of this work

Relativity of value and the consequentialist umbrella.Jennie Louise - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):518–536.
A Third Method of Ethics?Roger Crisp - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (2):257-273.
Virtue ethics and virtue epistemology.Roger Crisp - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (1-2):22-40.
Reasons and value – in defence of the buck-passing account.Jussi Suikkanen - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):513 - 535.

View all 40 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references