The Laws of Scientific Change

Cham: Imprint: Springer (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book systematically creates a general descriptive theory of scientific change that explains the mechanics of changes in both scientific theories and the methods of their assessment. It was once believed that, while scientific theories change through time, their change itself is governed by a fixed method of science. Nowadays we know that there is no such thing as an unchangeable method of science; the criteria employed by scientists in theory evaluation also change through time. But if that is so, how and why do theories and methods change? Are there any general laws that govern this process, or is the choice of theories and methods completely arbitrary and random? Contrary to the widespread opinion, the book argues that scientific change is indeed a law-governed process and that there can be a general descriptive theory of scientific change. It does so by first presenting meta-theoretical issues, divided into chapters on the scope, possibility and assessment of theory of scientific change. It then builds a theory about the general laws that govern the process of scientific change, and goes into detail about the axioms and theorems of the theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can men change laws of social science?Alan Gewirth - 1954 - Philosophy of Science 21 (3):229-241.
The philosophy of history of science of Thomas Kuhn.Alexander Bird - 2012 - Discusiones Filosóficas 13 (21):167 - 185.
Philosophy of science and historical enquiry.John Losee - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Getting science wrong: why the philosophy of science matters.Paul Dicken - 2018 - London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
The Role of History in Science.Richard Creath - 2010 - Journal of the History of Biology 43 (2):207 - 214.
Introduction: Historiography and the philosophy of the sciences.Robin Findlay Hendry & Ian James Kidd - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:1-2.
Is the philosophy of science scientific?A. Cornelius Benjamin - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (4):351-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-14

Downloads
4 (#1,590,841)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hakob Barseghyan
University of Toronto, St. George

Citations of this work

Duhem on Good Sense and Theory Pursuit: From Virtue to Social Epistemology.Jamie Shaw - 2020 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 33 (2):67-85.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references