The consequent-entailment problem foreven if

Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (3):249 - 260 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A comprehensive theory ofeven if needs to account for consequent ‘entailing’even ifs and in particular those of theif-focused variety. This is where the theory ofeven if ceases to be neutral between conditional theories. I have argued thatif-focusedeven ifs,especially if andonly if can only be accounted for through the suppositional theory ofif. Furthermore, a particular interpretation of this theory — the conditional assertion theory — is needed to account foronly if and a type of metalinguistic negation ofQ if P. We therefore have evidence that the currently accepted approaches to conditionals are basically wrong about the semantic forms they attribute toif P, Q.11



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,726

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

76 (#216,240)

6 months
21 (#164,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Barker
Nottingham University

References found in this work

A Natural History of Negation.Laurence R. Horn - 1989 - University of Chicago Press.
A Natural History of Negation.Laurence R. Horn - 1989 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 24 (2):164-168.
Conditionals.Angelika Kratzer - 1986 - Chicago Linguistics Society 22 (2):1–15.
A Defense of Conditional Excluded Middle.Robert Stalnaker - 1981 - In William Leonard Harper, Robert Stalnaker & Glenn Pearce (eds.), Ifs. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. pp. 87-104.
Conditionals.Frank Jackson - 1987 - New York: Blackwell. Edited by Michael Devitt & Richard Hanley.

View all 15 references / Add more references