Towards an intuitionist account of moral development
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):546-547 (2005)
Abstract
Sunstein's characterization of moral blunders jointly indicts an intuitive process and the structure of heuristics. But intuitions need not lead to error, and the problems with moral heuristics apply also to moral principles. Accordingly, moral development may well involve more, rather than less, intuitive responsiveness. This suggests a novel trajectory for future research into the development of appropriate moral judgments.DOI
10.1017/s0140525x05260090
My notes
Similar books and articles
Cognitivism, controversy, and moral heuristics.Matthew D. Adler - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):542-543.
Moral heuristics: Rigid rules or flexible inputs in moral deliberation?Elizabeth Anderson - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):544-545.
On moral intuitions and moral heuristics: A response.Cass R. Sunstein - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):565-570.
Towards a Dynamic Systems Approach to moral development and moral education: a response to the JME Special Issue, September 2008.Minkang Kim & Derek Sankey - 2009 - Journal of Moral Education 38 (3):283-298.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
69 (#176,155)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2009-01-28
Downloads
69 (#176,155)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
On intuitional stability: The clear, the strong, and the paradigmatic.Jennifer Cole Wright - 2010 - Cognition 115 (3):491-503.
No Need to Get Emotional? Emotions and Heuristics.Andras Szigeti - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):845-862.
Subjective Moral Biases & Fallacies: Developing Scientifically & Practically Adequate Moral Analogues of Cognitive Heuristics & Biases.Mark H. Herman - 2019 - Dissertation, Bowling Green State University