Reactions of Potential Jurors to a Hypothetical Malpractice Suit Alleging Failure to Perform a Prostate-Specific Antigen Test

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):396-402 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We conducted focus groups with 47 potential jurors who were presented with diferent scenarios in a hypothetical malpractice case involving failure to order a PSA test. Better documentation that a patient made an informed decision to decline a PSA test appeared to provide more medical-legal protection for physicians, especially with the use of a decision aid

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What's Wrong With Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer?Stewart Justman - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):21-25.
Second Circuit Permits State Malpractice Suit against HMO.Anna Lumelsky - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (4):734-736.
Intention, Interpretation and Contemporary Visual Art.Hans Maes - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2):121-138.
Technology report: Intelligent summoner. [REVIEW]Robert E. Macneel - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (4):277-285.
What is Humpty-Dumptyism in Contemporary Visual Art? A Reply to Maes.K. E. Gover - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (2):169-181.
Look who's moving the goal posts now.Larry Hauser - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):41-51.
Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals.Kevin D. Ashley - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (4):321-370.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
30 (#517,657)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?