On two issues in science and religion: A response to David Griffin

Zygon 23 (1):83-88 (1988)


. In responding to David Griffin's critique of my book, Issues in Science and Religion, I suggest that most of the points which he initially presents as differences between us concerning reduction and emergence are resolved in the second half of his article. I spoke of the emergence of higher‐level “properties” and “activities,” rather than “entities,” but my analysis of whole and parts is similar to his, although it was perhaps not always clearly articulated. We agree also that Alfred North Whitehead's God is involved in every event in ways which avoid the problems of the supernatu‐ralist “God of the gaps,” but we differ as to whether God's action might be taken into account in a new “post‐modern” science

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

38 (#303,338)

6 months
1 (#386,031)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Griffin and Pike on Divine Power: Some Clarifications.David Basinger - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:347-352.
Creativity in Post-Modern Religion.David Ray Griffin - 1985 - In Michael H. Mitias (ed.), Creativity in Art, Religion, and Culture. Distributed in the U.S.A. By Humanities Press.
Process Philosophy of Religion.David Ray Griffin - 2001 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 50 (1/3):131-151.
Science and Religion: A Search for Synergism.Jared Michael Jones - 2005 - Dissertation, Texas A&M University