Must Physicians Reveal Their Wounds?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5 (2):204 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The physician–patient relationship is anchored in trust. Historically the relationship has been a paternalistic one, with the patient expected to trust the physician's training and skills in doing what is “best” for the patient. But medical knowledge has expanded, as have treatment options and knowledge of the risks of treatment. The physician must now possess volumes of specialized knowledge about procedures and treatments, side effects and alternatives, drugs and their contraindications. Information has become a companion to trust. The patient, while still dependent on the physician's expertise, now wants information about choices and hazards in treatment. Expanded choice has made the patient a consumer of healthcare and its risks rather than a passive recipient of treatment from the professional

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hotep's story: Exploring the wounds of health vulnerability in the US.Ken Fox - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (6):471-497.
Experimental Wounds: Science and Violence in Mid-Century America.Susan Lindee - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (1):8-20.
What doctors should call their patients.M. Lavin - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):129-131.
Died of Wounds.G. W. W. - 1918 - The Classical Review 32 (3-4):84-.
The wounds in Iliad 13–16.K. B. Saunders - 1999 - Classical Quarterly 49 (02):345-.
The Alchemy of Informed Consent.Richard T. Hull - 2002 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 13 (1):63-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
19 (#775,535)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?