Abstract
In “The Will to Believe,” William James affirms that we have some control over what we believe and asks how this control should be exercised. He rejects the evidentialists’ view that we ought to believe only when intellectual grounds make it quite sure that the belief is true. For him, “options” are choices among contrary beliefs. Some options are “living,” “forced,” and “momentous.” James’ thesis concerns belief-options that have these three features and where proof as to the truth is unavailable. He holds that in such cases we have a right to believe, provided believing has better consequences than not believing would. James is correct that sometimes it is permissible to believe without adequate grounds. His view is misleading, though, when he leaves the impression that this is so only where the option is living, forced, momentous, and not settleable by evidence. The right to believe has broader scope than this. Moreover, James’ right to believe presupposes a view of truth at odds with his later pragmatism
Keywords Conference Proceedings  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 978-1-889680-19-4
DOI wcp201999476
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Clifford's Principle and James's Options.Richard Feldman - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (1):19 – 33.
The Ethics of Belief.Michael Lopresto - 2011 - Emergent Australasian Philosophers (4):9.
William James's Conception of Truth.Bertrand Russell - 1992 - In William James & Doris Olin (eds.), William James: Pragmatism, in Focus. Routledge.
William James's "the Will to Believe" and the Ethics of Self-Experimentation.Jennifer Welchman - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (2):229-241.
William James.Max Carl Otto (ed.) - 1942 - Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.
James' Pragmatic Account of Intentionality and Truth.Henry Jackman - 1998 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (1):155-181.
Re-Reading ‘the Will to Believe’.Ludwig F. Schlecht - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (2):217-225.
The Challenge of William James's Philosophy of Religion.Celal Türer - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:25-30.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
40 ( #285,880 of 2,520,806 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,806 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes