Inconsistent Regulatory Protection under the U.S. Common Rule

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):366-379 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

U.S. regulations do not afford consistent protections to human research subjects. One complaint is that they focus on federally sponsored research, with private research covered only if it falls under the jurisdiction of the Food and Drug Administration. This paper examines a deeper problem: Even when the regulations do apply, they still do not afford consistent standards of protection. The U.S. Common Rule and related FDA regulations lack a workable regulatory control mechanism

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vulnerability as a Regulatory Category in Human Subject Research.Carl H. Coleman - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):12-18.
The U.S. Regulations and the Protection of Pediatric Subjects.Stephen Napier - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 4 (1).
Informed Consent in Pediatric Research.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):346-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
42 (#527,041)

6 months
11 (#327,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references