Elementary differences between the degrees of unsolvability and degrees of compressibility

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (7):923-934 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given two infinite binary sequences A,B we say that B can compress at least as well as A if the prefix-free Kolmogorov complexity relative to B of any binary string is at most as much as the prefix-free Kolmogorov complexity relative to A, modulo a constant. This relation, introduced in Nies [14] and denoted by A≤LKB, is a measure of relative compressing power of oracles, in the same way that Turing reducibility is a measure of relative information. The equivalence classes induced by ≤LK are called LK degrees and there is a least degree containing the oracles which can only compress as much as a computable oracle, also called the ‘low for K’ sets. A well-known result from Nies [14] states that these coincide with the K-trivial sets, which are the ones whose initial segments have minimal prefix-free Kolmogorov complexity. We show that with respect to ≤LK, given any non-trivial sets X,Y there is a computably enumerable set A which is not K-trivial and it is below X,Y. This shows that the local structures of and Turing degrees are not elementarily equivalent to the corresponding local structures in the LK degrees. It also shows that there is no pair of sets computable from the halting problem which forms a minimal pair in the LK degrees; this is sharp in terms of the jump, as it is known that there are sets computable from which form a minimal pair in the LK degrees. We also show that the structure of LK degrees below the LK degree of the halting problem is not elementarily equivalent to the or structures of LK degrees. The proofs introduce a new technique of permitting below a set that is not K-trivial, which is likely to have wider applications

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Randomness, Lowness and Degrees.George Barmpalias, Andrew E. M. Lewis & Mariya Soskova - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2):559 - 577.
Infima of d.r.e. degrees.Jiang Liu, Shenling Wang & Guohua Wu - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (1):35-49.
A jump operator on honest subrecursive degrees.Lars Kristiansen - 1998 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 37 (2):105-125.
The Isolated D. R. E. Degrees are Dense in the R. E. Degrees.Geoffrey Laforte - 1996 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 42 (1):83-103.
Bi-Isolation in the D.C.E. Degrees.Guohua Wu - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):409 - 420.
On the very idea of degrees of truth.Timothy Cleveland - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (2):218 – 221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-18

Downloads
50 (#311,236)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Low upper bounds in the LR degrees.David Diamondstone - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (3):314-320.
Algorithmic randomness and measures of complexity.George Barmpalias - 2013 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 19 (3):318-350.
Algorithmic Randomness and Measures of Complexity.George Barmpalias - 2013 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 19 (3):318-350.
Kolmogorov complexity and computably enumerable sets.George Barmpalias & Angsheng Li - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (12):1187-1200.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem.Alan Turing - 1936 - Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 42 (1):230-265.
Systems of logic based on ordinals..Alan Turing - 1939 - London,: Printed by C.F. Hodgson & son.
A minimal pair of recursively enumerable degrees.C. E. M. Yates - 1966 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (2):159-168.
Almost everywhere domination and superhighness.Stephen G. Simpson - 2007 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 53 (4):462-482.
[Omnibus Review].Rod Downey - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (3):1048-1055.

View all 11 references / Add more references