History and Theory 51 (3):436-450 (2012)

Abstract
ABSTRACTIn 1929 Ernst Cassirer and Martin Heidegger participated in a momentous debate in Davos, Switzerland, which is widely held to have marked an important division in twentieth‐century European thought. Peter E. Gordon's recent book, Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, centers on this debate between these two philosophical adversaries. In his book Gordon examines the background of the debate, the issues that distinguished the respective positions of Cassirer and Heidegger, and the legacy of the debate for later decades. Throughout the work, Gordon concisely portrays the source of disagreement between the two adversaries in terms of a difference between Cassirer's philosophy of spontaneity and Heidegger's philosophy of receptivity, or of “thrownness” , into a situation that finite human beings can never hope to master. Although it recognizes that this work provides an important contribution to our understanding of the Davos debate and to twentieth‐century European thought, this review essay subjects Gordon's manner of interpreting the distinction between Cassirer and Heidegger to critical scrutiny. Its purpose is to examine the possibility that important aspects of the debate, which do not conform to the grid imposed by Gordon's interpretation, might have been set aside in the context of his analysis
Keywords philosophy of existence  Cassirer  Heidegger  Davos debate  history of Being  relativism  decisionism  symbolic forms
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00638.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reflections on Continental Divide: An Author's Response.Peter E. Gordon - 2015 - History of European Ideas 41 (4):454-469.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hans Blumenberg's Philosophical Anthropology: After Heidegger and Cassirer.Vida Pavesich - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 421-448.
Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos (Review).Sebastian Luft - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):508-509.
Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos.Alick Isaacs - 2013 - Common Knowledge 19 (2):393-394.
Angoisse et finitude: Heidegger et Cassirer à Davos en 1929.Peter A. Schmid - 2000 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 3:381-399.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
25 ( #455,788 of 2,506,999 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,393 of 2,506,999 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes