De la alienación imitativa a la potencia mimética: Platón y Adorno, Aristóteles y Benjamin

Universitas Philosophica 35 (71):145-173 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay defends that mimesis is an inherently agonistic and paradoxical human practice. The divergent views on mimesis by Plato and Aristotle, as well as by Adorno and Benjamin, are the philosophical manifestation of an agonistic tension of human mimesis that is not resolved in the exclusive truth of one of the positions, but remains as a permanent possibility to create alternative paths in history.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Walter Benjamin: The Colour of Experience. [REVIEW]Peter Fenves - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 53 (4):920-922.
Aesthetics and politics.Ernst Bloch (ed.) - 1977 - London: NLB.
Benjamin, Adorno e la “fisiognomica”.Giovanni Gurisatti - 2010 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 3 (2).
Benjamin and Adorno on Critical Theory and Redemption.Leopard Zeng - 2001 - Philosophy and Culture 28 (12):1109-1128.
El concepto filosófico de la alienación.Edgardo Albizu - 1990 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 2 (2):133-147.
Tra Benjamin e Adorno: il valore testimoniale del realismo di Kafka.Antonio Valentini - 2010 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 3 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-02

Downloads
11 (#1,110,001)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations