Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):146-159 (2013)

Authors
Linda Barclay
Monash University
Abstract
Most democratic countries either limit or deny altogether voting rights for people with cognitive impairments or mental health conditions. Against this weight of legal and practical exclusion, disability advocacy and developments in international human rights law increasingly push in the direction of full voting rights for people with cognitive impairments. Particularly influential has been the adoption by the UN of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2007. Article 29 declares that states must ‘ensure that persons with disabilities can effectively and fully participate in political and public life on an equal basis with others, directly or through freely chosen representatives, including the right and opportunity for persons with disabilities to vote and be elected’. This article also argues for the right of all people to vote, including people with cognitive impairments, by adopting a uniquely strategic approach. Firstly, some of the strategic limitations of existing arguments in favour of extending the franchise are highlighted. Most such arguments are flawed because they run the risk of inviting disparaging philosophical commentary which compares disabled people to animals, or because they are based on implausible empirical claims, or because they inadvertently tie the case for voting rights for the disabled to other cases unlikely to ever enjoy widespread acceptance. This article, instead, justifies extending voting rights to all people with cognitive impairments based on a simple cost-benefit analysis that avoids all of these problems
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.12020
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Political Agency in Humans and Other Animals.Angie Pepper - 2021 - Contemporary Political Theory 20 (2):296-317.
The Value of Inclusion.Franziska Felder - 2018 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 52 (1):54-70.
Le concept de vulnérabilité et l’inclusion politique des personnes ayant une déficience intellectuelle.Bernard Gagnon & Olivier Clément-Sainte-Marie - 2019 - Alter - European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne de Recherche Sur le Handicap 13 (3):192-206.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-05-17

Total views
54 ( #211,849 of 2,517,926 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,926 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes