An Approach to Anti-Foundationalism from Stanley Fish’s Literary Theory

Revista Contacto 1 (2):52 - 74 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to approach Stanley Fish’s anti-foundationalist argument whose clear formulation is found in the development of his literary theory. For this reason, we will start by, first, introducing Fish's literary theory, and, second, it is explored some aspects of Fish’s theories and their bonds with anti-foundationalism.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Fish Shticks: Rhetorical Questions in Stanley Fish's Doing What Comes NaturallyDoing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. [REVIEW]John Michael & Stanley Fish - 1990 - Diacritics 20 (2):54.
Postmodern Sophistry: Stanley Fish and the Critical Enterprise.Gary A. Olson & Lynn Worsham - 2004 - SUNY Press.
Where is my body? Stanley fish's long goodbye to law.Richard Delgado - unknown
Consequences.Stanley Fish - 1985 - Critical Inquiry 11 (3):433-458.
Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies.Stanley Fish - 1991 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (4):375-378.
Stanley fish and the old quarrel between rhetoric and philosophy.David Roochnik - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (2):225-246.
Explaining Our Literary Understanding: A Response to Jay Schleusener and Stanley Fish.Ralph W. Rader - 1975 - Critical Inquiry 1 (4):901-911.
Versions of Academic Freedom: From Professionalism to Revolution.Stanley Fish - 2014 - University of Chicago Press.
"Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies": Stanley Fish. [REVIEW]Michael Benton - 1990 - British Journal of Aesthetics 30 (4):386.
If You Count It, They Will Come.Stanley Fish - 2013 - Humanist Studies and the Digital Age 3 (1):11.
Hermeneutics and Post-Modernism: Can We Have a Radical Reader-Response Theory? Part I.Paul R. Noble - 1994 - Religious Studies 30 (4):419 - 436.
Stanley Fish, and an Anti-Foundationalist Consept of Law.Ross Motabhoy - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Kent
Hermeneutics and Post-Modernism: Can We Have a Radical Reader-Response Theory? Part I: PAUL R. NOBLE.Paul R. Noble - 1994 - Religious Studies 30 (4):419-436.
Fear of Fish: A Reply to Walter Davis.Stanley Fish - 1984 - Critical Inquiry 10 (4):695-705.
Stanley Fish on Philosophy, Politics and Law: How Fish Works.Michael Spencer Robertson - 2014 - Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-18

Downloads
163 (#114,242)

6 months
56 (#75,122)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy and social hope.Richard Rorty - 1999 - New York: Penguin Books.
La filosofía y el espejo de la naturaleza.Richard Rorty - 1987 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 43 (1):205-206.
Russian Formalism.Victor Erlich - 1973 - Journal of the History of Ideas 34 (4):627.

Add more references