- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Argumentum ad hominem: From chaos to formal dialectic
Logique Et Analyse 20 (77):76-96 (1977)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Argumentum ad Hominem: From Chaos to Formal Dialectic. The Method of Dialogue-Tables as a Tool in the Theory of Fallacy.Barth Em & J. L. Martens - 1977 - Logique Et Analyse 20 (77-78):76-96.
The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument.Graciela Marta Chichi - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):333-348.
Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem. [REVIEW]Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):141-159.
Locke and Whately on the Argumentum ad Hominem.Henry W. Johnstone - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (1):89-97.
Introduction to ‘Philosophy and Argumentum ad Hominem’.Douglas Walton - 1993 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 12 (3-4):24-24.
Ad hominem arguments in practical argumentation.Eerik Lagerspetz - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (2):363-370.
Philosophy and Argumentum ad Hominem'Revisited.".Henry W. Johnstone Jr - 1970 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 24 (1=91):107-116.
Henry Johnstone's Anagnorisis: Argumentum ad Hominem as Tragic Trope of Truth.Tom Heeney - 1995 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (4):388 - 404.
The argumentum ad hominem and two theses about evolutionary epistemology: "Godelian" reflections.James E. Martin & George B. Kleindorfer - 1991 - Metaphilosophy 22 (1-2):63-75.
The ad Hominem argument as an informal fallacy.Douglas N. Walton - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):317-331.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-02-10
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2014-02-10
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.R. Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 283-301.
Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.
Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren - 2009 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
The ad Hominem argument as an informal fallacy.Douglas N. Walton - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):317-331.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo