What is the O-Corner Interpretation and Does it Save the Traditional Square of Opposition?

Felsefe Arkivi 1 (51):37-59 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To salvage traditional logic and traditional square of opposition from the problem of existential import, logicians have been offering solutions for centuries. In this paper, firstly it will be argued that as far as we know, the historically first solution proposed by Abelard in 11th century and by Seuren in 2002 is actually a version of the O-Corner Interpretation of traditional logic, which is generally attributed to the 14th-century logician Ockham. Secondly, it will be advocated that two systems of Abelard and of Ockham have the same logical power. Lastly, the main claim will be that Abelard’s and Seuren’s system shall be favored over Ockham’s system.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From the Square to Octahedra.José David García Cruz - 2016 - In Jean-Yves Béziau & Gianfranco Basti (eds.), The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser. pp. 253-272.
Kant on Existential Import.Alberto Vanzo - 2014 - Kantian Review 19 (2):207-232.
Questions and Answers about Oppositions.Fabien Schang - 2011 - In Jean-Yves Beziau & Gillman Payette (eds.), The Square of Opposition: A General Framework for Cognition. Peter Lang. pp. 289-319.
The power of the hexagon.Jean-Yves Béziau - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (1-2):1-43.
The existential assumptions of traditional logic.Dwayne Hudson Mulder - 1996 - History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1 & 2):141-154.
The existential assumptions of traditional logic.Dwayne Hudson Mulder - 1996 - History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1-2):141-154.
Leibniz’s Logic and the “Cube of Opposition”.Wolfgang Lenzen - 2016 - Logica Universalis 10 (2-3):171-189.
Two Standard and Two Modal Squares of Opposition.Jiri Raclavsky - 2016 - In Jean-Yves Béziau & Gianfranco Basti (eds.), The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser. pp. 119-142.
The traditional square of opposition.Terence Parsons - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Square of opposition.Author unknown - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-21

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yavuz Recep Başoğlu
Central European University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references