Why Did U.S. Healthcare Professionals Become Involved in Torture During the War on Terror?

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (3):449-460 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines why U.S. healthcare professionals became involved in “enhanced interrogation,” or torture, during the War on Terror. A number of factors are identified including a desire on the part of these professionals to defend their country and fellow citizens from future attack; having their activities approved and authorized by legitimate command structures; financial incentives; and wanting to prevent serious harm from occurring to prisoners/detainees. The factors outlined here suggest that psychosocial factors can influence health professionals’ ethical decision-making.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The tortured patient: a medical dilemma.Chiara Lepora & Joseph Millum - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (3):38-47.
Torture and the War on Terror.Gila Walker (ed.) - 2009 - Seagull Books.
Torture and the Ticking Bomb.Bob Brecher (ed.) - 2007 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Terror, torture and democratic autoimmunity.Leigh M. Johnson - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (1):105-124.
Torture, Power, and Law.David Luban - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Ethics for enemies: terror, torture, and war.F. M. Kamm (ed.) - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Torture and democratic violence.Paul W. Kahn - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (2):244-259.
Torture Approval in Comparative Perspective.Peter Miller - 2011 - Human Rights Review 12 (4):441-463.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-17

Downloads
30 (#521,181)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?