Tras los monstruos de la biopolítica

Dilemata 12:27-46 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I examine the figure of the monster, in both its negative and positive aspects, such as the notion of biopolitics. As a negative figure, the monster would represent the dehumanized subject produced by exclusion mechanisms operating in destructive version of biopolitics, resulting in thanatopolitics, and in this sense provokes horror and abjection. Here I will use the analyses of the anthropological machine (Agamben), the device of the person (Esposito) and indefinite detention (Butler). As a positive figure, the monster would represent the new subject trying to articulate productive versions of biopolitics, and is distinguished by its metamorphic and posthuman appearance, and in this sense would be subject and object of joy. Finally, as a project of affirmative biopolitics, I discuss Butler’s proposal of a new way of thinking about the political community that assumes the original vulnerability of the subject

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biopolítica y formas de vida.Rubén Antonio Sánchez (ed.) - 2007 - Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de Filosofía.
Teoría de la Frontera y de la Bioética a la Biopolítica.Xavier Rubert de Ventós - 2006 - Eusko Jaurlaritzaren Artialpen Zerbitzu Nagusia = Servicio Central de Publicaciones Del Gobierno Vasco.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
35 (#431,398)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Homo sacer.Giorgio Agamben - 1998 - Problemi 1.

Add more references